Tuesday 19 January 2016

What are the Courts Working On?

It is a well-known fact that there are an enormous number of cases that have been filed before the Indian courts. It is an equally well-known fact that many of these cases have been pending before the said courts for several years.  Talks of pendency always seem to centre on these huge, and more often than not, unfathomable numbers. There is however, a third, and lesser discussed aspect to this pressing issue of pendency – the subject matter of these multiple and much delayed cases.

That is the very question we are asking in this blog post– what are the kinds of cases that the courts are working on? To answer this question, we’ve chosen to look at a single High Court from our database - the High Court of Karnataka.

Among the information we collect for each case record we have in our database, we have case types. The table below illustrates the distribution of case types for 2,34,795 case records that we have for the High Court of Karnataka. In addition, the table compares the duration of pendency across these various case types. So without further ado, let’s look at what the High Court of Karnataka is working on.


CASE TYPE
CASE TYPE  FULL FORM
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL CASES
PENDENCY IN DAYS
WP
Writ Petition
30%
866
MFA
Miscellaneous First Appeal
29%
1,168
CRL.P
Criminal Petition
11%
775
RSA
Regular Second Appeal
7%
1,514
RFA
Regular First Appeal
5%
1,553
CRL.A
Criminal Appeal
3%
1,270
CRL.RP
Criminal Revision Petition
2%
1,025
WA
Writ Appeal
2%
991
COP
Company Petition
1%
2,179
ITA
Income Tax Appeal
1%
1,408
MSA
Miscellaneous Second Appeal
1%
1,015
CRP
Civil Revision Petition
1%
935
CA
Company Application
1%
926
RP
Review Petition
1%
902
CMP
Civil Miscellaneous Petition
1%
806
CP
Civil Petition
1%
782
CCC
Civil Contempt Petition
1%
633
MFA.CROB
Miscellaneous First Appeal Cross Objection
0.50%
1,007
RPFC
Review Petition Family Court
0.50%
745
Others

1%
1043

There are multiple inferences that can be read from this table, but right off the bat, a couple jump out.

The first natural question of course, is, what kind of cases are most prevalent? At the top of the list, with a 30 per cent majority are Writ Petitions (WP). To quickly explain, writ petitions are cases filed by persons whose fundamental right have been violated by the state. So, in number speak, one third of the cases are those filed against the government or government agencies.

For an even larger, but not quite so obvious statistic, consider this: in the second column, just look for the word ‘appeal’ and then add up the percentages next to each of those case types. Together, seven case types – various kinds of appeals – account for 48 per cent of the total. An appeal is in essence a request to a higher court to review and revise the decision of a lower court. That means for about half these cases pending before the High Court, judicial time has already been spent, and this is the second time before a court.

The table also throws up possible correlations (or lack of) between the number of cases and average pendency. According to the data, Company Petitions (COP) have the longest average pendency of 2,179 days, about six years. However, they make up only 1 per cent of the sample. Whereas, Writ Petitions (WP), which make up one third of the total, are pending on average for the relatively shorter time period of 866 days or 2 years and 4 months.

The paragraphs above contain just a few of my thoughts as I created and looked at this table. They are but a tiny speck in the pool of questions that can be asked and the analyses that can be carried out using this data. Ultimately, what this table clearly illustrates is that understanding the composition of judicial workload is a much needed step towards building sustainable solutions to pendency.

Do you have any thoughts, ideas or questions about this data? If you do, let us know by leaving a comment below. We are eager to hear from you. 

15 comments:

  1. Nice article, which you have shared here. Your article is very informative and I liked your way to express your views in this post. The article you have shared here is very informative and the points you have mentioned are very helpful. Thanks for sharing this article here. Judgements of Supreme Court

    ReplyDelete
  2. أنا ممتن جدًا لك لتقاسم هذه المعرفة الضرورية. هذه المعلومات مفيدة جدا للجميع. لذا يرجى دائما مشاركة هذا النوع من المعلومات. شكرا مرة أخرى لتقاسمها. الرجاء زيارة موقعنا على شبكة الإنترنت مكتب ترجمة معتمد بمدينة نصر

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the great post you posted. I like the way you describe the unique content. The points you raise are valid and reasonable. I am a tech support expert telling you about.
    robinhood wallet
    Robinhood Crypto Wallet
    MetaMask Login

    ReplyDelete
  4. I just stumbled upon your site, and I've been enjoying your articles.
    Great stuff! It covers very useful information. the posts are great.
    Thank you for sharing such useful information.مكتب ترجمة معتمد

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for your great blog and your post is very interesting. Keep it up!!!
    contract dispute settlement agreement
    protective order virginia

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very good impressive post!!!.I need more post like that.

    quiebras cerca de mí

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you for sharing this insightful post! Your writing style is engaging and informative, and I appreciate how you bring attention to the important points. As a technology enthusiast myself, I find your perspective on this topic very valuable. Keep up the great work!
    Separation Agreement in Virginia

    ReplyDelete
  8. As a technology enthusiast myself, I find your perspective on this topic very valuable. Keep up the great work!
    Estate-planning-lawyer Me

    ReplyDelete
  9. I especially enjoyed the practical examples you included. I can personally attest to its positive impact. Thank you for this insightful article. proceso de divorcio no disputado en virginia


    ReplyDelete
  10. Its a very nice and useful commentry.. just loved reading your content
    abogados de bancarrota en roanoke virginia!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Your writing is engaging and easy to follow, making it a pleasure to read. I particularly liked how you provided concrete examples to illustrate your points, which helped me better understand the concepts you were discussing. Thank you for taking the time to share your knowledge and expertise.How Many Points Is Reckless Driving in New Jersey

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bufete de Abogados Accidentes de Camiones
    The text provides an informative summary of the current work of courts, focusing on high-profile cases, legal trends, court processes, legal impact, transparency, audience engagement, feedback collection, grammar and language, and conclusion. The title is informative and prompts curiosity about the content's subject matter. The content covers various court systems, including federal, state, and international, and highlights the relevance of understanding the legal landscape. The text also discusses emerging legal trends, challenges, and issues that courts are addressing. The stages and processes involved in cases before the courts help readers understand the legal system. The text also explores the potential legal, societal, or policy impacts of ongoing court cases and decisions. The text emphasizes the importance of transparency and accessibility, encouraging readers to share their thoughts on specific cases or legal issues in the comments. The text also includes a call to action to stay informed about court developments and explore related legal topics. The content should consider addressing different court systems or jurisdictions for a comprehensive perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Fascinating insights on 'What are the Courts Working On?' Your blog sheds light on the legal landscape, providing a glimpse into the dynamic world of justice.
    New Jersey Careless Driving Ticket
    How Much is a Careless Driving Ticket in New Jersey

    ReplyDelete
  14. Remember to check reliable and credible sources for accurate and up-to-date information on court activities. Additionally, consider that the availability of information may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the case. If you have a specific court or type of case in mind, checking with the relevant court's official channels would be a good starting point.abogado dui prince edward va
    abogado de divorcio en virginia
    divorcio de nueva jersey

    ReplyDelete