The Bombay High Court has today given its verdict in Salman Khan’s appeal. A lower court had found him guilty in a hit-and-run case. The High Court took just over 7 months to decide this appeal. Salman Khan, I am sure, will be relieved that his appeal has been decided so quickly, and of course, in his favour. Most criminal appeals, unfortunately, do not get decided as promptly. In the DAKSH database, we have details of 52,921 criminal appeals pending in 18 High Courts across the country. On an average, the pendency is 5 years and 9 months. Appeals in the Bombay High Court actually take longer. Currently, the DAKSH database has details for 657 criminal appeals pending in the Bombay High Court. The average pendency is just over 13 years! So, Salman Khan should thank his lucky stars that his case was decided so quickly. Of course, Salman Khan was already out on bail pending his appeal. Many other people who are convicted by the lower courts do not get bail and spend time in jail while their appeals are decided by the High Courts.
While Salman Khan’s troubles may be over, the quick disposal of his appeal in fact raises troubling questions about the functioning of our judicial system. While delays are part and parcel of our judicial system, prioritisation of certain cases over others, and the reasons for such favoured treatment, challenge the notion of equality. The judiciary should follow the ‘first in, first out’ principle in disposal of cases, except where there is a demonstrated urgency. And the first in, first out principle should apply amongst the cases which are deemed urgent as well. Identity of the individuals involved in the cases should not be a determining factor for determining the urgency involved. Instead, it is the subject matter of a case which should determine the urgency involved and the need for priority. The Salman Khan appeal, and the Jayalalithaa appeal (decided by the High Court of Karnataka in super quick time pursuant to a direction of the Supreme Court) are seriously troubling exceptions to the travails of the ‘other people’ whose appeals go on for years.
How can we put pressure on the legal system to follow a FIFO system for both regular and urgent cases? It makes the citizen feel disenfranchised when the justice system takes a case out of turn because the defendant is an important person. Also, what are your comments about the acquittal of a case owing to legal technicalities and why did the lower court not see fit to acquit the accused?ReplyDelete
Thanks. These are difficult questions! We are working on potential solutions and will be coming out with recommendations in due course.Delete
yes do a same study for sc also you will be more surprised than thisReplyDelete
Another season of Bigg Employer is ready to start soon. We also know that commoners have been asked to audition for Bigg Supervisor 11. It appears like the future season is just as before going to be always a mad blend of commoners and superstars. The speculations across the contestants of the Bigg Manager house is also at its maximum. But the labels that have cropped up in the Bigg Supervisor 11 set of contestants can be no real surprise to many. Apparently, a list was just lately leaked of contestants contacted for the Salman Khan-hosted show and it includes a few popular brands, one which is YouTube discomfort Dhinchak Pooja.ReplyDelete
Bigg Boss 11 Who Will Win
Watch Bigg Boss 11 Full episode Online
Who Will Win BB Season 11
Some things are good. Some are great. Then comes this blog.ReplyDelete
This blog is a first class work, It is indeed a classic work of art.ReplyDelete
Nice information, You have provided excellent data for us about auto accident lawyer san antonio. It is valuable and informative for everyone. Keep posting always. I am very thankful to youReplyDelete
Excellent Article as it had discussed many things with high quality contents. Keep posting like this alwaysReplyDelete
Smyth Conducción imprudente
Abogado Tráfico Harrisonburg VA